Chris Cunningham goes against what the CCCS
says this is because he has created a music video that has its own genre and
style. This goes against what the CCCS says because they believe that anything
that isn’t the mainstream is a sub culture rebelling against the mainstream.
Cunningham’s work is very original because it doesn’t follow mainstream music
video ideas. For example one of his really original music videos “all is full
of love” was made for Bjork and was very different and unique idea and nothing like
any mainstream music video.
Gondry’s video goes against CCCS as well
and his video with Daft Punk is so unique it brings a different subculture.
Gondry’s made the video based on the different instruments used in the song. He
done this by having steps going up and down the stage and 4 groups of actors
each representing a different instrument, each of the actor goes up or down the
stairs depending on the beat. This is what makes his work so original and so
different to the mainstream.
Hebdige believed in little cultures instead
of mainstream and subcultures and this relates to Cunningham’s work because I
believe his ideas are from within his little culture and not something that is
rebelling against the mainstream. Also as people get older their taste in music
develops and becomes different. This relates to McCrackens theory of people
becoming apart of a different culture. However I believe that Cunningham’s work
made the mainstream artist become a part of another cultures and blend the
music culture and his video culture to make one final subculture.
Gondry is like Cunningham in the sense that
they both create there on little culture or sub-culture according to the CCCS.
Daft Punk audience varies from all ages and this is because they make Popular
music which listen to by all people of all ages. By working with Daft Punk,
Gondry mixed his little culture with Daft Punk’s mainstream culture and made
something new.
Cunningham’s work doesn’t follow the dyers
theory on the paradoxes and I believe this is because his videos are so
original that they don’t go with theories on mainstream videos. For example in
Bjorks video there is robots instead of the artist so already the theory
doesn’t work. The same goes for
Goodwin’s theory, the video is so unique its almost as if it has its own
narrative which doesn’t relate to the lyrics at points.
I’m going to create mainstream video and
this is because I still have much to learn about making music videos. Also when
making an alternative music video I would have to consider a budget and also
maybe need better equipment and a professional crews help to bring my ideas to
real life.
A thoughtful account of alternative style music videos that has used theory to support the analysis into generic conventions and the intentions behind specific music videos.
ReplyDelete